Real Economics

At some point we have to ask ourselves if money is so effective at getting things done and charities get the good things done, when are we going to start giving them more money?

The Possibilities

"Quality, quantity, and continuity..."

A real economy is an economy that integrates charity within it, in order to solve the problems of humanity and the environment, of which the economy is based on.

An economy is a summation of all transactions within a given area. The global economy consists of all the transactions on earth. Real Economics is the integration of charity within every transaction, charity that goes back to the earth from which all transactions stem.

This solves many, if not all of the major problems on earth that money can solve. This adds quality, quantity, and continuity to the environment and humanity. This is Real Economics.

Real Economics

What is certified Real Economics?

Real Economics consists of five qualities of charity integrated into economics: Net Charity, Prioritized Charity, Transactional Charity, Quantified Charity, & Short-Term Charity. See below for definitions of each quality.

If one of these qualities are missing the operation is not considered to be a certified Real Economics operation.

Real Inc. - the central organization representing Real Economics as outlined on this page - is in the process of rolling out a board of certification for evaluating, determining, and offering "Real Economics Certified" certificates for businesses to display. Until then, any such certificates or statements related to being certified or abiding by Real Economics and its standards has not been approved by Real Inc..

Net Charity

Net Charity consists of donating 100% of net-profit. In other words, donating what you don't need to what the world needs, so that it can continue to make what you need. And as mentioned above, wealth contribution doesn't just produce continuity, but also greater quantity and quality as well. For a great organization to get associated with the concept of giving 100% of profit to charity, with examples of those already doing it, please see 100forpurpose.org.

Profit (specifically net profit) is generally revenues that gets paid out to shareholders as dividends (cash payments) after subtracting monies needed for running, maintaining, and growing the business such as expenses, investments, cash reserves, etc..

It is important to note that what is one person's necessity may be another person's want. It is up to each individual to be honest in determining what he or she needs and doesn't need. Some may suffice with bare essentials while some require certain luxuries.

Prioritized Charity

Prioritized Charity consists of donating to recipients in a prioritized manner. Acceptable recipients include humanity and the environment. The environment includes all non-human life (i.e. animals and plants) and any inanimate matter (i.e. land, air, water) to which life relies upon.

Amongst the two basic recipients of humanity and the environment, the utmost priority is donating to humanity. A tree cannot wrap the bandage of a child, but a tree can be planted and cared for by a child, let alone by an adult.

There are many other reasons for such prioritization of humanity over the environment, but only one needs to be stated: human ingenuity. As we've seen and can see continually, it only takes the ingenuity of one human, let alone many, to solve global problems, the problems of the environment included.

Whether reasonable or not, it is generally a fixed standard to attend to a suffering person over a suffering animal, over a suffering plant, etc., when they are directly in front of most people. It is safe to say that even an environmentalist would quickly become a humanitarian if a person struggling for their life was directly in front of them.

Within humanity, there is a prioritization. Donating to life-saving medical treatments, eliminating hunger and thirst, etc., comes before donating to a toy fund.

Within the environment, there is not much of an across-the-board consensus as to what should be prioritized. Generally speaking, it is widely accepted that animals be given priority over plants and inanimate matter.

An operation may offer its customers the choice as to which charitable effort they want the profit to be donated to (as we do in the Real Store) but according to Real Economics standards, the owners of the operation must prioritize the charity they give when the choice as to where the profit is to be donated is theirs.

Transactional Charity

Transactional Charity consists of stating in an apparent manner, before or during every transaction, what is to be donated and to whom, from the proceeds of that transaction.

In other words, charity is to be calculated on a transaction to transaction basis, i.e., what each transaction will contribute to charity from the proceeds of that transaction, and that contribution must be stated in an apparent manner before or during each transaction.

The reason the term "proceeds" is used here and not "net-profit" is because some may deem it beneficial to contribute to charity regardless if there is a net-profit, due to the tendency of charitable contributions to incentivize purchases (revenue) as a whole.

Quantified Charity

Quantified Charity consists of actual amounts of charitable impacts per unit(s) of currency donated (e.g. $1 feeds 1 person 1 meal). It is the type of charity that can be seen throughout Real Inc. such as in the Charities page or in any product page in the Real Store.

Quantified Charity is the preferred method of depicting charitable impacts for charities themselves, as it provides charitable impact upfront before the donation is even given, which incentivizes giving the donation itself.

Many charities already know what amounts of charitable acts are being done per unit of currency donated, but donors should also know. Not only does it make donors want to donate more because they know with confidence what they're money is accomplishing, they can also visualize it, and therefore be more immersed in it.

As far as companies are concerned, instead of the usual and obscure “10% of profit is donated to charity” with no description of what’s actually being done, companies can tell their customers that “$1 per purchase is donated to x number of charitable acts.”

A stated contribution of Quantified Charity from sales can drive even more sales, by giving customers a visualization that their purchases are doing good for the world. As well, a company contributing to charity, let alone Quantified Charity, induces a desire in the customer to continue to associate with the company to begin with. In most cases, customers desire a company to be charitable rather than not.

Overall, Quantified Charity is more actionable, more measurable, more immersive, and overall more desirable, and because of this, Quantified Charity is a counter against not caring about charity to begin with.

Short-Term Charity

Short-Term Charity consists of donating to the charity that is stated during a transaction, soon after the transaction is completed, and the sooner the better. Real Economics requires that the charity stated during a transaction be given at most within a year of completing the transaction.

The many benefits that come with giving to those in need as soon as possible is straightforward. The recipient aside however, there are strong benefits for the donor as well. One of them being that the sooner one fulfills their donation commitments, the sooner they eliminate any possibility of breaking one's commitments, and therefore their reputation as well.

Real Inc. is currently developing the capability for charity to be given immediately as soon as transactions are completed. When fully developed, integrating this capability should be available to all.

Real Inc.

What is Real Inc.?

Real Economics Incorporated or Real Inc. for short is the incorporation of Real Economics into the world by putting it into practice and helping others do the same.

Real Inc. is the initial example and template for others to know how to integrate Real Economics into their own operations.

Putting Real Economics into practice includes things like the Real Store, the Real Plaza, and Real Social.

Helping others do the same includes things like this very page, outreach, and tools that we're developing that will automate charity integration into a company’s backend financials and onto their frontend for customers to freely choose donation options as they can do in the Real Store.

What is the Real Store?

(Content taken from the Real Store page)

The Real Store consists of products that are a balance between fashionable and functional and their function is their fashion. On every product the focus is on one element and that's the name (Real Inc.). Why? Because getting the most people to Real Inc. will get the most charity done and the greatest advertisement is our own apparel and accessories.

The goal of the Real Store is to eventually provide people with a way to buy everything they need and want, but charitably. Imagine Amazon or Temu but with Real Store style donation selection lists for each product.

What is the Real Plaza?

(Content taken from the Real Plaza page)

In the Real Plaza you'll find a wide variety of businesses you can buy from, but with a catch. When you enter these businesses using the "Enter" button tied to each one, you've actually tapped an affiliate link, and that means that we receive a share of what you paid and 100% of the net-profit from that share gets donated. The Real Plaza has the potential to make all stores charitable (as long as they provide affiliation partnerships).

What is Real Social?

(Content taken from the Real Social page)

Real Social consists of social media pages that advertise stores and then donates all the ad profit. This simultaneously promotes not just these stores, but also Real Economics as a whole, and in a charitable way.

People pay to advertise in front of an audience and on social media that's the followers. The goal of Real Social is to gather as many followers as possible, in order to gather as much ad profit as possible, so that we can donate it all to charity. Real Social is converting the follower into a donor and the follow button into a donate for free button.

What if people don't want to give?

Real Economics requires that people give to charity, but what if they don't want to? That's what Real Economics Incorporated (Real Inc.) is for, to incorporate Real Economics into the world and there are various means to do so. Namely, convincing others (through education and outreach such as through Real Social), collaborating with others (such as through the Real Plaza), or competing with them if they don't want the former two (such as is the goal of the Real Store).

Why give what I earned?

The data says you should

If you're a business owner, the data says that the more you give what you earned, the more you're likely to earn even more.

Forbes:

87% of consumers will have a more positive image of a company that supports social or environmental issues.

88% will be more loyal to a company that supports social or environmental issues.

87% would buy a product with a social and environmental benefit if given the opportunity.

92% will be more likely to trust a company that supports social or environmental issues.

88% of consumers want brands to help them be more environmentally friendly and ethical.

Consumers are 4 to 6 times more likely to purchase, protect, and champion purpose-drive companies.

It's a financial investment

Contrary to popular belief, giving to charity is actually more of an investment than it is a donation. Donating is commonly understood to be giving with nothing expected in return. In reality, what we call donating is really more of investing. When you give to charity you gain more in return. Charity is profitable.

"This is precisely what is found in the S.C.C.B.S. (Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey) data: More giving doesn’t just correlate with higher income; it causes higher income. And not just a little. Imagine two families that are identical in size, age, race, education, religion, and politics. The only difference is that this year the first family gives away $100 more than the second...the first family will, on average, earn $375 more as a result of its generosity (an ROI of 275%)." - aei.org/articles/giving-makes-you-rich/

"Data from the Statistical Abstract of the United States and the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University provide examples: In 2004, $100 in extra income per American drove about $1.47 in additional charitable giving per person. At the same time, $100 in giving stimulated more than $1,800 in increased G.D.P. This rate of social return shows that economic-multiplier effects are not limited to private investment. In short, giving plays a positive role in American economic growth. It is a good investment for our country. Some might even go so far as to say that donating to charity is a patriotic act." - ibid.

Benevolence is the root of all benefit. On the contrary, being malevolent is malfunctional and destroys what the malevolent itself depends on, eventually causing its own destruction.

Benefit is only to be found where there is benevolence. Such benefits include more love, gratitude, honor, respect, trust, etc., from others, and even from within oneself. These are only benefits towards oneself. More so, benevolence vastly benefits anyone it touches, including humanity and the environment, of which we all rely. Simply put, the world is built on benevolence.

Economically speaking, people amass their fortunes from their buyers. The more buying there is, the more selling there is and vice versa. Buyers are also sellers and vice versa. Growing the pool of buyers (by elevating them from poverty and suffering), grows the economy, of which is the summation of all transactions between buyers and sellers.

The one receiving your charity can eventually be the one buying your product and even selling their own to you because it provides you with value. Giving to the poor helps them get rich which helps you get and / or stay rich.

More so, what largely goes amiss about giving to the poor and the suffering is the richness in the way they get to riches themselves. Ask yourself the last time you were in the dumps if you ever wanted to go back when you got out. People who have endured poverty would endure not to go back. Those who were on the edge of death are those who have an edge on life and those who have suffered are those who strive not to suffer but to thrive.

Value is only produced where it's not and value / production makes our economy bigger and better.

It’s a trade incentive

Customers prefer to purchase from those who contribute to humanity and the environment of which they are a part of and rely on, especially when done according to Real Economics (see above).

This incentive for the buyer is also an advantage over the competitor who doesn’t contribute to charity, or doesn't do so according to the standards set forth by Real Economics.

If your competitors already contributes to charity, and according to Real Economics, and you don't, and in many cases your potential customers prefer your competitors because of this, so it is you that has to match the new market standard, and start giving to charity according to Real Economics.

It gives reputability


In many ways, money can't buy you a good reputation, but a reputation of you doing good, gives you a good reputation. It’s hard to hate and resent you if you contribute to charity, especially when it's according to Real Economics. It’s much easier to love, respect, trust, and be grateful to you. All the more so for the one actually receiving your charity of whom could also end up being your buyer and one day even your seller.

It provides wellbeing

All the answers given above for the question "Why give what I earned?" have shown that donating is really more like investing, with potentially very high profitable returns on investment. But what is the greatest return one can get on their investment? The answer is wellbeing, which largely includes health and happiness. Everything else we do depends on this.

That means that if donating makes us healthier and happier, and everything else we do depends on these two things, then donating isn't just a profitable investment, it's the greatest investment we can make. Here's but a few pieces of evidence, amongst much more available online:

savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/the-health-benefits-you-ll-receive-by-donating-to-charity

greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_helpers_high

ggsc.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/GGSC-JTF_White_Paper-Generosity-FINAL.pdf

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15901215/

It's the right thing to do

At a certain level of wealth, the question becomes “what do I need it for?” If it’s not for your wellbeing then it should be for the wellbeing of others.

What if I didn’t earn it?

If you have not worked for your wealth then you should not feel any resentment when given the opportunity to give something that you didn't earn to those who didn't earn it either but need it more.

How is this different from government aid?

Charity is aid

Government aid actually hinders Real Economics, meaning people giving to charity. In other words, Real Economics shows that we don't need government to give the aid, because that's what charities are for. There is one very important condition however: that people prioritize which charities they give to (one of the required facets of Real Economics, see above) and that the charities do what they're supposed to do.

As to why government aid is antithetical to Real Economics, this is not because governments can't be charitable, they absolutely can, but at the expense of its citizens not giving to charity. Government revenue comes from taxes. When government revenue goes up the revenue of the citizens goes down. When there’s big government from big taxes there’s no big contributions from the people (and therefore a people untrained to be contributive) and no big charities either.

As well, the goal of Real Economics is not to give to charity but not needing to. The end goal of charity is to not have to give it at all. This comes from self-sustainability, and for us, in our time, that means work.

Work is done in a business and higher taxes means less money for the business to hire and pay its workers, let alone to grow and be a successful, let alone, well-maintained business. Excessive taxes, over-regulation, complicated compliance, these are hindrances on giving people a job, not allowing them to sustain themselves and therefore the entire economy as a whole.

Government is a necessity. But when government gets unnecessarily big, the citizen gets unnecessarily small, and subsequently, the government gets unnecessarily small as well. The smaller the citizen, the smaller the tax, the smaller the government, and the smaller the giving (of charity) to the world, whether by citizen, or government.

Nurture needs nurturing

Giving is a good quality to have, and in many ways, it is the definition of goodness itself. But when government is doing all the giving (by first taking from the people), there's nothing left for people to give. There's no room for goodness. There's no means to nurture the trait of nurturing others. As mentioned above, this produces a people untrained to be contributive. It's hard to think of things worse than that.

Charity is by choice

Government aid comes from taxes which are taken against the will of the taxpayer. Real Economics based contributions are given at will by those who desire to give them and one can find the incentives as to why to do so in the section above. If they don't want to give see the last question in the Real Inc. section above.

Now, it seems to be a part of basic human nature for people to not have the will to do, what their forced to do against their will. Forcing someone to give, in many ways, eliminates their desire to give to begin with. A people that doesn't desire to give, is a people that blindly desires its own demise.

Rather, instead of government forcing a tax to fill the aid budget, it would be more beneficial for us all, including for the government itself, to simply educate business owners on why giving charity (according to Real Economics) is better for their business (as explained throughout the section above this one), including the incentivization of customers to buy (and continue buying) from their business.

Now let's say that most businesses do end up giving to charity, and there is no longer a competitive advantage to do so. While the competitive advantage has dissipated, there is however a new market standard, whereby customers expect businesses to be charitable, and if a business is not, they'll simply take their money to a business that is. Sounds like a new tax-like burden on businesses.

However, as explained above, a tax is forced, and under the threat of severe punishments such as fines and even prison. Real Economics is not a system of taxation. It is merely a way of doing business. Any such burden that arises from it, will be as any other "creative destruction" and disruption that arises from innovation, as seen throughout history.

Follow the money

Government aid goes through the government and the government isn't known to have a pristine track record of efficiency and morality. On the other hand, as surprising as it might be for some, in a study done by the charity GiveDirectly and five charity researchers, it became clear that people who lack basic necessities were free from corruption. That's hard to say about politicians, of whom handle the aid money before it ever sees the hand of whom they should be aiding.

Just Launched