Not among the most excitable of topics for most, yet by far the most practically engaging for anyone seeking to turn the tables this way and that. In this article we go into some points on why we should point at economics, when making a point of saving the world.

Real Economics is basically economics that is real. In and of itself, that statement is ambiguous. This article explores the different meanings of realness and how that applies to Real Economics.

Unsurprisingly, yet delayed (until now), is an economic system that isn't polarized to one side of the economic spectrum, but includes and incorporates both sides of that spectrum, blending the best of both.

One of the five qualities required of Real Economics is that of "Prioritized Charity." Simply put, it's charity that is prioritized towards the survival and ending of suffering of humanity, over the environment.

It seems eventual that humans will solve their most critical problems of survival and suffering. The question for Real Economics then is, where should charity be prioritized to? The answer of course, is the environment.

In our time, a bull market for humanity produces the opposite of a bull's eye for it. When profits are produced, they should go to where they're needed, and where it's needed most is Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa to be specific.

This article explores what realness means in the sense of continuity, how what ceases to exist ceases to be real altogether, and how that applies in a relative sense to our economy, and therefore to our world as a whole.

Real Economics requires that people give 100% of their net-profit to charity, but what exactly does that entail? Is that really so narrowly defined as one's dividend earnings from a company as modern accounting defines it? Or is it really much more than that?

Real Economics and its system of "charity by choice" is great and all, but sellers can simply choose not to give, then what? The answer lies in the customers' choice to purchase from Real Economics certified companies, establishing a new market standard for companies across the board.

Charity is generally a movement towards the bottom parts of the economic pyramid. In this article we're going to try to visualize this process and it's implications on a macroeconomic scale.

For a long time now, charity directories and evaluators are handing out ratings for charities rightfully based on charitable performance, but unrightfully based on the "program expense ratio." A term that isn't just a financial mistake, but a harm to charitable effectiveness worldwide.