Part One: What’s The Deal?

What’s the deal with economics? Why is it significant? Why should the average folk have any care in the world for it? For starters, everyone has a home. And if you desire a properly managed planet, the home of all our homes, then you also desire a proper economic system. 

The word "economy" comes from two etymological roots: “eco-” and “-nomy”. “Eco-” comes from the Greek word “oikos” meaning house. “-Nomy” comes from the Greek word “nomos” or “nemein” meaning management, law, rules.

Economics is a lot more than the popular idea of it as a study and practice of money. It is a study and practice of the management and laws of all life, not only human life. We see this in a similar word with similar origins: Ecology.

The word "economy" is essentially the same as the word “ecology” except for the difference in their suffixes. The suffix “-ology” means "the study of." Ecology, similar to “economy” is the study of the household. Just as ecology studies all life, so too economics deals with all of life. It is only because we are humans that we use economics to manage human resources. Technically, however, economics can apply to all life on earth. In a broader sense, economics is the management of the world.

Thus far we have seen that etymologically, the economy is the management of the home (with the ultimate home being the world). Colloquially, the economy is the management of resources (or wealth, aka money). The etymological and colloquial meanings however, do not differentiate. The world is made up of resources, therefore, managing resources is managing the world, and vice versa. When you hear economics, don't just think about it as the management of resources or wealth, think about it as the management of the world.

PArt Two: Scarcity

While economics is the management of the world / resources, more specifically, economics is the management of a finite world and the scarcity of resources. 

Sal Khan of Khan Academy (backed by Google and MIT) teaches the following about economics in his Intro to Macroeconomics (in the module titled “Scarcity”) available in Khan Academy:

“The entire field of economics is based on the idea of scarcity, and arguably we wouldn't even need a field of economics if there wasn't the notion of scarcity in the world.” Elsewhere he mentions thus: “Victorian historian Thomas Carlyle once called economics the ‘dismal science’ because he believed it obsessively focused on the scarcity of resources.” (See the module: “Lesson Summary”)

Sal also mentions that “Scarcity is sometimes considered the basic problem of economics. Resources are scarce because we live in a world in which humans’ wants are infinite but the land, labor, and capital required to satisfy those wants are limited. This conflict between society’s unlimited wants and our limited resources means choices must be made when deciding how to allocate scarce resources.”

Part Three: The Government

To understand the importance of economics we can simply open our eyes to the concept that economic systems are completely intertwined with governmental / political systems and can even be considered as governmental systems in their own right. 

The government governs the world, this includes not just resources or wealth, but also people. People are primarily involved in collaboration, creation, contribution, and consumption. These are economic activities. The majority of the weekday of any adult is (hopefully) work. Whether considered as such or not, the government mainly governs economics, with the government itself being a major player in global and local economies.

The two major economic systems, Capitalism and Socialism, can both be considered political systems in their own right. These economic systems dictate how governments operate at their most fundamental level.

Socialism is an economic system whereby resources are controlled by the government, (supposed to be) representing and serving the public's interests. Capitalism is an economic system whereby resources belong to private interests, and as such, trade is primarily left to natural forces (without any governmental intervention). However, even capitalism is entirely entwined with the government.

It can be said that the whole idea of capitalism is to reduce the meddling of governments in markets, yet even so, governments create the legal frameworks (property rights, regulations) and adjudications that sustain capitalist markets to begin with.

As well, while the government, which is just people, dictates the rules, everyone in the government also needs an income, and to ensure that those they govern have an income as well, and secure at that.

According to the Torah (from which Real Economics is derived) the government is akin to a mouth, using words to rule. An economy is akin to the entire body as a whole, with all its parts and their contributions to other parts of the body / economy. One part is contributing education (the brain, which educates the mouth), one part is contributing infrastructure (the bones and vascular system), etc., with the mouth playing its part to try to direct the body with internal sub-local speech (talking to oneself).

Without a body, what good is a mouth, and more so, what good is a mouth without the blood providing and powering it according to its needs. Blood in the Torah, is a metaphor for money itself, the main element of economics.

If we look at the state of global economies today, we can see that there are three basic forms of economies: command economies (run by the government), market economies (run by human nature), and mixed economies (a mix of the previous two). The reality however, is that while some economies are government controlled and some are more free, all economies are essentially mixed economies, just like a body.

Part Four: Honey

What of money? What is its significance? For starters, money doesn’t just buy happiness, if vacations, pets, games, entertainment, being healthy and educated along with your family and friends, (and if your a man then) security and safety for your wife so that you can have a wife and family to begin with, making meaningful impacts in the world, etc., is your version of happiness.

Money buys (high quality and quantity of) food, water, clothes, shelter, medicine, education. Money doesn’t just buy happiness, it buys health. Try to be happy without your health. Without your health you're not alive, what of happiness then? 

If you’re religious, money buys religious books and the building and maintenance of temples, it provides for rabbis and priests so that they can spiritually provide for us. 

Saving lives costs money. Making the world a better place costs money. And as money is the main element of economics (the management of money), saving lives and making the world a better place, takes economics. And the better the economics, the better the world.

Part Five: The Final Drizzle

Modern economics is not without its flaws, and they are statedly numerous in their details. This isn’t the article to go into those flaws and their details, nor is it necessarily our place. Real Economics doesn’t seek to make capitalism or socialism better, but rather to make a better economic system altogether which includes and binds the benefits of both.

Capitalists desire free trade, socialists desire a redistribution of the wealth that arises from such trade. With Real Economics, both are possible using the power of charity, the main idea behind Real Economics. In order for their to be charity, there must be free trade to produce the profits that can be donated. At the same time, donating those profits to those parts of the humanity and the environment that need it more, is in essence, the redistribution of wealth. Of course, the immediate question is why would capitalists give of their hard earned wealth, and the answers are to be found throughout our "What Is Real Economics?" page.

That being said, charity aside, and as mentioned above, there are no economies today that are not mixed, and rightfully so. Free markets increase production, while governments increase production security. As such, Real Economics doesn't seek to deviate from other forms of economics if they are beneficial. This may even include other not-so-popular forms of economics such as circular economics, environmental economics, doughnut economics (not the economics of doughnuts), etc., all with their own benefits that can be utilized for the benefit of the world.

The name Real Economics itself, was inspired by the Jewish concept of “emet,” which translates to truth, synonymous with the word "real." Emet, contains the first, middle, and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet, making it a word of inclusivity. Truth is taught to be that which is continuous and unceasing, but also, the sages of the Torah teach that truth is that which contains “this and that,” meaning inclusivity, and if “that” is lacking, then it’s not true. Meaning, truth is wholeness, containing all parts, representative in the word emet, which contains the letters (or parts) from the beginning, middle, and end of the Hebrew alphabet.

Real Economics, by definition, would not just be an economics of continuity, but also an economics that includes all elements of economics, minus their negatives, which take away from the economy’s “continuity” and therefore its "trueness" to begin with.

Just Launched